One Management View
All critical project information in one place.
DASHBOARDS & VISIBILITY
Integrated management views that turn raw project data into decisions you can act on — the same dashboards your leadership reviews every reporting cycle.
FROM DATA TO DECISIONS
Execution generates data. Leadership needs decisions. INDUS PMO converts schedule, cost, progress, risk and resource data into one management view — so deviations surface early and corrective action happens on time.
All critical project information in one place.
Decisions based on verified project data.
Corrective actions taken at the right time.
DASHBOARD NAVIGATION
Management View and Delivery & Risk View — everything leadership needs, in one place.
Overall health score, key indicators and status.
02SPI and CPI against baseline.
03Planned vs actual S-curve and outlook.
04What is due, what is exposed.
05Deployment against plan.
06The full executive one-pager.
One executive view of schedule, cost, progress and risk status — the first thing leadership should see, and the fastest way to know whether a project needs attention this week.
The overall health score reflects schedule, cost, risk and progress performance against agreed thresholds.
Status thresholds are agreed with your project leadership during PMO setup, so “Watch” always means the same thing across reporting periods.
SPI and CPI turn project progress and cost data into two indicators leadership can act on. A value of 1.00 represents the baseline — a sustained movement below 1.00 provides an early warning of schedule or cost performance pressure.
Track schedule efficiency and identify emerging deviation.
94% of the planned rate, indicating schedule performance below baseline.
Twelve periods of gradual decline — the schedule is slipping steadily, not suddenly. Recovery planning starts here.
Monitor cost efficiency and highlight potential cost pressure.
Cost efficiency is slightly below baseline — actual cost is marginally higher than value earned.
Cost efficiency crossed below baseline at period four and has held flat — contained, but worth watching.
Two curves answer the questions leadership actually asks: how far behind are we today, and when will this finish? Both are read from the approved baseline, so the gap is measurable rather than anecdotal.
Visualise progress against the approved baseline.
Actual progress is consistently below plan across all 12 periods, resulting in a -15% variance at the current reporting period.
Baseline finish date versus current forecast.
Current forecast indicates completion in March 2027, three months later than the approved baseline finish date.
Milestones show what has actually been achieved; the risk register shows what could stop the next one. Reviewed together, they turn a status meeting into a decision meeting.
Milestones show actual achievement against key deliverables. Risks and issues show what could impact progress and what we are doing about it.
Monitor key deliverables, milestones and completion status.
| Delivery Stream | Baseline | Progress | Variance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Design
|
100% | 100% | 0% | On Track |
|
Procurement
|
100% | 92% | -8% | On Track |
|
Civil
|
100% | 78% | -22% | Behind Plan |
|
MEP
|
100% | 55% | -45% | Behind Plan |
|
Handover
|
100% | 20% | -80% | Behind Plan |
Design closed and procurement nearly complete — MEP is now the critical path into handover.
Provide management visibility of open risks, issues and priority actions.
RISK DISTRIBUTION (OPEN ITEMS)
22 Open Items — three high-priority items are actively escalated with assigned owners and due dates. All other items remain tracked within the risk register.
TOP HIGH PRIORITY RISKS / ISSUES
| ID | Risk / Issue | Owner | Due | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-01 | Delay in MEP equipment delivery | S. Kumar | 25 May 2026 | Open |
| R-02 | Site access restriction – Block B | A. Ramesh | 18 May 2026 | Open |
| R-03 | Long lead item – Transformer | M. Prakash | 30 May 2026 | Open |
Compare planned and actual resource deployment and trends. A persistent shortfall between planned and deployed resources can contribute to declining SPI.
Planned is the resource level we planned to deploy. Actual is what was actually deployed. The gap indicates under-mobilisation; closing it can improve productivity and support schedule recovery.
Deployment has remained ten resources below plan since period seven — making resource mobilisation a key lever for schedule recovery.
Under-mobilisation of -10 resources is contributing to:
Integrated Planning – Controlled Execution
The project schedule model is developed in industry-standard tools with a logic-driven structure, resource-loaded activities and baseline control to ensure measurable execution and reliable forecasting.
A well-structured schedule model connects scope, time and resources. It forms the foundation for monitoring performance, identifying risks and making proactive decisions.
Developed in Primavera for detailed planning, resource loading, baseline control and progress monitoring.
Developed in Microsoft Project for high-level planning, stakeholder reporting and practical project tracking.
One Integrated Executive View
This dashboard integrates schedule, cost, resource and performance information into one management-level view for rapid decision-making. This is the view your leadership receives each reporting cycle — every number traceable to the execution data behind it.
Consolidates the individual KPI views into one management-level dashboard for rapid decision-making.
OVERALL PROJECT HEALTH
Requires management attention
Target ≥ 1.00
Target ≥ 1.00
57% vs 72% · -15%
| Design | On Track | |
| Procurement | On Track | |
| Civil | Behind Plan | |
| MEP | Behind Plan | |
| Handover | Behind Plan |
Summary of open risks and issues.
22 Open Items · 3 require immediate attention
110 / 120 · -10 Sustained Gap
MANAGEMENT VISIBILITY
Tell us your project type, location and project requirements.